240.393.0744
Performant Software
Production-grade software for print, mail, and fulfillment workflows
Why choose Performant Software?
Built for Ops
Your production workflows are complex, high-volume, and unforgiving. I build custom print systems software that replaces brittle spreadsheets and tribal knowledge with reliable, production-grade systems. No off-the-shelf portals. No forced workflows. Just software designed around how your operation actually runs.
A Strategic Engineering Partner
You know your operation. I bring deep experience designing and building software for print, mail, and fulfillment systems. Together, we translate real production workflows into reliable software that reduces risk, removes manual interpretation, and holds up at scale.
Custom, Not Off-the-Shelf
Most print operations outgrow generic platforms and spreadsheets long before they realize it. I build custom systems tailored to how your business actually runs—integrating with your existing tools and vendors without forcing disruptive process changes or shared platforms.
A Proven, Production-First Process
We start by understanding your workflows, constraints, and failure points. From there, I design and deliver software that encodes production rules upstream—so jobs are validated, repeatable, and production-ready before they ever hit the floor.
Most print and fulfillment teams depend on tools that weren’t designed for their real processes, leaving critical knowledge in people’s heads and spreadsheets.
At Performant Software, I design and build proprietary print systems that formalize those workflows, reduce rework, and support high-volume production without adding operational overhead.
From Workflow to Production-Grade Software
Step 1: Complexity Is Being Managed Manually
Most print, mail, and fulfillment operations evolve organically. New clients, new job types, and new requirements get layered on top of what already exists. Over time, critical workflows become a mix of spreadsheets, shared folders, emails, and unwritten rules. The operation still functions, but consistency depends heavily on individual experience and constant manual coordination.
Step 2: Scale Increases Risk and Friction
As volume grows or personalization becomes more complex, those ad hoc systems start to show strain. More time is spent interpreting intent, double-checking inputs, and resolving exceptions. Small upstream inconsistencies turn into downstream rework. The concern isn’t that things are broken, it’s that growth, change, or staff turnover increases risk in ways that are hard to see or control.
Step 3: We Make the Implicit Explicit
This is where I come in. We take what currently lives in people’s heads and scattered tools and make it explicit: how data should look, how templates are configured, how jobs are validated, and what “production-ready” actually means in your environment. The goal is not to redesign your operation, but to formalize it in software so it behaves the same way every time.
Step 4: Software Becomes a Stabilizing Layer
The result is a production-grade system that reduces manual interpretation and absorbs complexity instead of amplifying it. Workflows become repeatable, exceptions become intentional, and growth becomes less risky. You’re no longer relying on spreadsheets and heroics to keep things moving. Software quietly enforces the rules your operation already depends on.
WHO I PARTNER WITH
Print & Mail Service Providers
Organizations running complex, high-volume print and mail operations that rely on variable data, multiple handoffs, and tight production windows. I help replace ad hoc workflows and spreadsheets with software that formalizes how production actually runs.
Fulfillment & Operations Teams
Teams managing kitting, warehousing, and order fulfillment where accuracy, timing, and coordination matter. I design systems that reduce manual interpretation, improve visibility, and support repeatable execution as volume and complexity increase.
Established Organizations
Mid-market and enterprise teams looking to modernize legacy tools or introduce custom software without disrupting day-to-day operations. I provide the engineering, systems thinking, and production awareness needed to evolve workflows safely and deliberately.
how we work
Technical Projects That Stabilize Print Operations
Print, mail, and fulfillment workflows tend to evolve in ad hoc layers: spreadsheets, email threads, vendor portals, and “the way we’ve always done it.” I build custom systems that replace fragile handoffs with reliable software. Below are the most common project types I’m brought in to design and deliver. Each one is grounded in production reality and built to scale with volume and complexity.
Customer Ordering Portals
Purpose-built portals that let customers submit jobs, upload assets, select options, and provide required data without back-and-forth. Includes guardrails that prevent incomplete orders, enforce required fields, and reduce “tribal knowledge” dependency. Can support approvals, proofs, and role-based access for multi-location clients.
Job Intake, Validation & Preflight Systems
Systems that standardize incoming data and assets so jobs are production-ready before they hit the floor. This includes validation rules, field mapping, data normalization, address checks, and repeatable job definitions. The goal is fewer surprises downstream and less manual interpretation upstream.
Variable Data & Template Mapping Platforms
Tools for defining templates, managing personalization fields, and mapping customer data into production-ready outputs. Designed to support repeatable campaigns, consistent template usage, and reduced setup time. Useful when your operation handles frequent VDP work and needs a dependable system of record.
Production Workflow & Queue Management
Internal systems that coordinate how work moves through stages: intake, proofing, prepress, production, finishing, and fulfillment. Includes visibility, status tracking, exception handling, and standardized handoffs between teams. Built to reflect how your shop actually runs, not how software thinks it should.
Vendor, Equipment & System Integrations
Integrations that connect portals, CRMs, ERPs, MIS tools, print engines, mailing partners, and fulfillment systems so jobs and statuses flow automatically. This includes API integrations, file handoff automation, event-driven updates, and auditability, reducing duplicate entry and manual syncing.
Reporting, Costing & Operational Dashboards
Dashboards and reporting tools that provide operational visibility: throughput, error rates, rework drivers, cycle time, volume by client/job type, and production bottlenecks. Built from your real data sources so leaders can make decisions without chasing spreadsheets or conflicting reports.
Frequently Asked Questions
If you’re running print, mail, or fulfillment operations at scale, you likely have questions about when custom software makes sense and what it takes to replace ad hoc workflows without disrupting production. Below are answers to the most common questions I get from teams looking to reduce risk, improve consistency, and modernize their systems safely.
When does it make sense to invest in custom software instead of more tools or spreadsheets?
It usually makes sense when critical workflows depend on manual interpretation, tribal knowledge, or constant clarification between teams. If volume, personalization, or complexity is increasing, and errors or rework are becoming routine, custom software can stabilize the operation without forcing a full platform replacement.
Do you replace our existing systems, or work alongside them?
Most projects work alongside what you already use. I design systems that integrate with your current tools, vendors, and equipment, focusing on the gaps where spreadsheets, emails, or manual steps create risk. The goal is to reduce friction, not rip and replace systems that already work.
How disruptive is this to day-to-day production?
Projects are designed to minimize disruption. We start with focused areas of high friction or risk, roll changes out incrementally, and validate against real workflows before anything becomes operationally critical. Production keeps moving while the system is introduced.
What kinds of workflows can you help formalize?
Common examples include job intake, data validation, template and field mapping, customer ordering portals, production handoffs, status tracking, vendor integrations, and operational reporting. If a workflow relies on spreadsheets or “knowing how it’s done,” it’s usually a good candidate.
Who owns the software and the data?
You do. The systems I build are custom and proprietary to your operation. Your data, workflows, and logic remain under your control. There are no shared platforms or locked-in business rules that prevent you from evolving the system over time.
How long do projects typically take?
Timelines vary based on scope and complexity, but most projects are delivered in phases. Initial systems often go live within a few months, with additional capabilities added as workflows are proven and refined. This approach reduces risk and keeps momentum steady.
What’s the best way to get started?
The best first step is a conversation focused on your workflows. We’ll talk through where complexity is being managed manually, where errors originate, and what “production-ready” really means in your environment. From there, we can decide if custom software is the right next move.